Artwork

Contenuto fornito da @Chrish289. Tutti i contenuti dei podcast, inclusi episodi, grafica e descrizioni dei podcast, vengono caricati e forniti direttamente da @Chrish289 o dal partner della piattaforma podcast. Se ritieni che qualcuno stia utilizzando la tua opera protetta da copyright senza la tua autorizzazione, puoi seguire la procedura descritta qui https://it.player.fm/legal.
Player FM - App Podcast
Vai offline con l'app Player FM !

Season 7 Episode 7 -Ms. Candace Owens Is Wrong About Child Support - The Facts vs. Fiction.

17:38
 
Condividi
 

Manage episode 444701474 series 2795103
Contenuto fornito da @Chrish289. Tutti i contenuti dei podcast, inclusi episodi, grafica e descrizioni dei podcast, vengono caricati e forniti direttamente da @Chrish289 o dal partner della piattaforma podcast. Se ritieni che qualcuno stia utilizzando la tua opera protetta da copyright senza la tua autorizzazione, puoi seguire la procedura descritta qui https://it.player.fm/legal.

Ms. Candace Owens Is Wrong About Child Support
The Facts vs. Fiction.

Back in 1935, I was introduced to the Aid to Dependent Children (ADC) program, which was part of the New Deal under the Social Security Act. It aimed to provide means-tested entitlements to families like mine, where fathers were either deceased, absent, or unable to work.
This support was crucial for us, helping to subsidize our income during challenging times.
The federal government gave states the authority to decide who received aid and how much they got.
It wasn't until 1961 that things changed. A new law allowed states to offer benefits to families even if the father was unemployed. It was a relief for many families, including mine, as it provided extra help when we needed it most.
Eventually, 25 states adopted this measure, recognizing the importance of supporting families facing economic hardship. Then, in 1962, the name of the program was altered to include "families with," reflecting concerns that the original rules might discourage marriage.
This change showed a shift in focus, acknowledging the diverse needs of families like mine, regardless of our marital status.
Child Support Lawsuit Simplified. We teach you strategies and techniques to free yourself of judicial misconduct from the State and Federal. The guarantee is YOURS.
❤️ Please Donate to Support The Research ----------
💎 https://bit.ly/ChildSupportMadeSimple
https://CASH.APP/$chrish289
📖 To Schedule Discussion and Connect ----------
👥 Calendar: https://bit.ly/Calendar-ChildSupport
📢 Email: Chrish289@protonmail.com
📝 Let's Connect On Social Media -------------
👍 Facebook: https://bit.ly/FB-ChildSupportMadeSmple
🐦 Twitter: https://twitter.com/chrish289
📸 Instagram: https://www.instagram.com/chrish289/
#childsupport #childsupportmadesimple #childsupportcourt

Support the show

Login into our => https://childsupport.newzenler.com

  continue reading

Capitoli

1. Introduction (00:00:00)

2. Candace's Claims (02:17:00)

3. King vs Smith (05:54:00)

4. Legal Implications (10:01:00)

5. Supreme Court Decision (12:02:00)

6. Conclusion (16:36:00)

79 episodi

Artwork
iconCondividi
 
Manage episode 444701474 series 2795103
Contenuto fornito da @Chrish289. Tutti i contenuti dei podcast, inclusi episodi, grafica e descrizioni dei podcast, vengono caricati e forniti direttamente da @Chrish289 o dal partner della piattaforma podcast. Se ritieni che qualcuno stia utilizzando la tua opera protetta da copyright senza la tua autorizzazione, puoi seguire la procedura descritta qui https://it.player.fm/legal.

Ms. Candace Owens Is Wrong About Child Support
The Facts vs. Fiction.

Back in 1935, I was introduced to the Aid to Dependent Children (ADC) program, which was part of the New Deal under the Social Security Act. It aimed to provide means-tested entitlements to families like mine, where fathers were either deceased, absent, or unable to work.
This support was crucial for us, helping to subsidize our income during challenging times.
The federal government gave states the authority to decide who received aid and how much they got.
It wasn't until 1961 that things changed. A new law allowed states to offer benefits to families even if the father was unemployed. It was a relief for many families, including mine, as it provided extra help when we needed it most.
Eventually, 25 states adopted this measure, recognizing the importance of supporting families facing economic hardship. Then, in 1962, the name of the program was altered to include "families with," reflecting concerns that the original rules might discourage marriage.
This change showed a shift in focus, acknowledging the diverse needs of families like mine, regardless of our marital status.
Child Support Lawsuit Simplified. We teach you strategies and techniques to free yourself of judicial misconduct from the State and Federal. The guarantee is YOURS.
❤️ Please Donate to Support The Research ----------
💎 https://bit.ly/ChildSupportMadeSimple
https://CASH.APP/$chrish289
📖 To Schedule Discussion and Connect ----------
👥 Calendar: https://bit.ly/Calendar-ChildSupport
📢 Email: Chrish289@protonmail.com
📝 Let's Connect On Social Media -------------
👍 Facebook: https://bit.ly/FB-ChildSupportMadeSmple
🐦 Twitter: https://twitter.com/chrish289
📸 Instagram: https://www.instagram.com/chrish289/
#childsupport #childsupportmadesimple #childsupportcourt

Support the show

Login into our => https://childsupport.newzenler.com

  continue reading

Capitoli

1. Introduction (00:00:00)

2. Candace's Claims (02:17:00)

3. King vs Smith (05:54:00)

4. Legal Implications (10:01:00)

5. Supreme Court Decision (12:02:00)

6. Conclusion (16:36:00)

79 episodi

Tutti gli episodi

×
 
Loading …

Benvenuto su Player FM!

Player FM ricerca sul web podcast di alta qualità che tu possa goderti adesso. È la migliore app di podcast e funziona su Android, iPhone e web. Registrati per sincronizzare le iscrizioni su tutti i tuoi dispositivi.

 

Guida rapida