Oral arguments before the Supreme Court of the United States, presented by Oyez, a multimedia judicial archive at the IllinoisTech Chicago-Kent College of Law.
…
continue reading
Unedited English audio of oral arguments at the Supreme Court of Canada. Created as a public service to promote public access and awareness of the workings of Canada’s highest court. Not affiliated with or endorsed by the Court. Original archived webcasts can be found on the Court’s website at scc-csc.ca. Feedback welcome: podcast at scchearings dot ca.
…
continue reading
Supreme Court Season episodes will include all arguments that occur from October 01st to June/July.
…
continue reading
The latest news and analysis about key cases and critical arguments before the Supreme Court. (Updated periodically) PBS NewsHour is supported by - https://www.pbs.org/newshour/about/funders
…
continue reading
The Supreme Court decision syllabus, read without personal commentary. See: Wheaton and Donaldson v. Peters and Grigg, 33 U.S. 591 (1834) and United States v. Detroit Timber & Lumber Co., 200 U.S. 321, 337. Photo by: Davi Kelly. Founded by RJ Dieken. Now hosted by Jake Leahy. Frequent guest host Jeff Barnum. *Note this podcast is for informational and educational purposes only.
…
continue reading
Brett and Nazim are two attorneys who hate being attorneys. Each week, they discuss current Supreme Court cases with the intent to make the law more accessible to the average person, while ruminating on what makes the law both frustrating and interesting. This podcast is not legal advice and is for entertainment purposes only. If anything you hear leads you to believe you need legal advice, please contact an attorney immediately
…
continue reading
A chronological podcast of oral arguments with improved files and meta data. Hosted by Free Law Project through the CourtListener.com initiative. Not an official podcast.
…
continue reading
Audio from oral arguments in the Supreme Court of the United States (beg. Oct. 2010)
…
continue reading
In depth explanations of Supreme Court Cases New Jersey v T.L.O, Mapp v Ohio, and Miranda v Arizona.
…
continue reading
Oral arguments before the Supreme Court of the United States, presented by Oyez, a multimedia judicial archive at the IllinoisTech Chicago-Kent College of Law.
…
continue reading
Oral arguments before the Supreme Court of the United States, presented by Oyez, a multimedia judicial archive at the IllinoisTech Chicago-Kent College of Law.
…
continue reading
Oral arguments before the Supreme Court of the United States, presented by Oyez, a multimedia judicial archive at the IllinoisTech Chicago-Kent College of Law.
…
continue reading
Oral arguments before the Supreme Court of the United States, presented by Oyez, a multimedia judicial archive at the IllinoisTech Chicago-Kent College of Law.
…
continue reading
Oral arguments before the Supreme Court of the United States, presented by Oyez, a multimedia judicial archive at the IllinoisTech Chicago-Kent College of Law.
…
continue reading
Oral arguments before the Supreme Court of the United States, presented by Oyez, a multimedia judicial archive at the IllinoisTech Chicago-Kent College of Law.
…
continue reading
A podcast feed for the audio of Supreme Court oral arguments and decision announcements. Short case descriptions are reproduced from Oyez.org under a CC BY-NC 4.0 license. This feed is not approved, managed, or affiliated with Oyez.org. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/
…
continue reading
We will dive into the astounding stories of the Supreme Court.
…
continue reading
Opinion announcements from the Supreme Court of the United States, presented by Oyez, a multimedia judicial archive at the IllinoisTech Chicago-Kent College of Law.
…
continue reading
The Queens Supreme Court podcast is the hilarious spinoff of the hit online series “The Queens Supreme Court” with Ts Madison. The premise of the weekly satirical show is to discuss pop culture and all the hot social media trends, topics and gossip THEN try them as cases, render judgements and sentence the crimes accordingly to determine the ultimate fate of each celebrity!
…
continue reading
Podcast by Hemant Mehta
…
continue reading
Any listeners out there...really want entertaining basketball content? Don't want to worry about the hosts - all on the show trying to force "controversial" hot takes, all in your earbuds, yelling back and forth to win an argument? Come to The Supreme Court: A Basketball Podcast! Check back with the SC trio; Robaire, Chris, and Henri, Wednesdays as we discuss the latest NBA headlines, news, and transactions.
…
continue reading
Throughout the years the Supreme Court has evolved much like the rest of the federal government. This would not be without landmark rulings, which will be the main focus of this podcast. Landmark rulings lay the groundwork for laws to be overturned or upheld and allow for the United States to work toward major goals. Support this podcast: https://podcasters.spotify.com/pod/show/aaron-larson2/support
…
continue reading
This study, A Christian Response to the Supreme Court Decision, exposes the foreboding Danger that this ruling will bring upon our nation if things don’t turn around very quickly. You will also be thoroughly equipped to give a loving Biblical apologetic response to 15 different accusations made against Christians regarding this issue.
…
continue reading
The First Amendment was at the center of two key Supreme Court arguments on Monday. One honed in on social media companies' handling of misinformation while the powerful gun lobby, the National Rifle Association, was at the center of the other. Geoff Bennett discussed the hearing with NewsHour Supreme Court analyst Marcia Coyle. PBS NewsHour is sup…
…
continue reading
PULSIFER v. UNITED STATES No. 22–340. Argued October 2, 2023—Decided March 15, 2024 After pleading guilty to distributing at least 50 grams of methamphetamine, petitioner Mark Pulsifer faced a mandatory minimum sentence of 15 years in prison. At sentencing, he sought to take advantage of the “safety valve” provision of federal sentencing law, which…
…
continue reading
1
NRA v. Vullo
1:03:55
1:03:55
Riproduci in seguito
Riproduci in seguito
Liste
Like
Like aggiunto
1:03:55
NRA v. VulloDi Supreme Court of the United States
…
continue reading
1
Trevor Ian James Lindsay v. His Majesty the King (40569)
1:06:26
1:06:26
Riproduci in seguito
Riproduci in seguito
Liste
Like
Like aggiunto
1:06:26
The appellant, Trevor Ian James Lindsay, is a constable with the Calgary Police Service. While processing an arrestee, an altercation occurred between the appellant and the arrestee that left the latter with serious injuries. The appellant was charged with aggravated assault under s. 268 of the Criminal Code. At trial, the appellant’s defence inclu…
…
continue reading
Time is a flat circle, folks. Fresh off the heels of two SCOTUS decisions, Brett and Nazim discuss the Supreme Court hearing Trump's Executive Immunity defense in Trump v. U.S., and the Supreme Court's holding in Trump v. Anderson which bars Colorado from removing Trump from the ballot. Next time we'll talk about something else. We promise. At leas…
…
continue reading
A case in which the Court will decide whether, when parties enter into an arbitration agreement with a delegation clause, an arbitrator or a court decides whether that arbitration agreement is narrowed by a later contract that is silent as to arbitration and delegation.
…
continue reading
1
Trump v. Anderson, No. 23-719 [Arg: 2.8.2024]
2:09:05
2:09:05
Riproduci in seguito
Riproduci in seguito
Liste
Like
Like aggiunto
2:09:05
QUESTION PRESENTED: Whether the Colorado Supreme Court erred in ordering former President Donald Trump excluded from the 2024 presidential primary ballot. ★ Support this podcast on Patreon ★Di Austin Songer
…
continue reading
1
Murthy, Surgeon Gen. v. Missouri
1:28:02
1:28:02
Riproduci in seguito
Riproduci in seguito
Liste
Like
Like aggiunto
1:28:02
Murthy, Surgeon Gen. v. MissouriDi Supreme Court of the United States
…
continue reading
Trump v. Anderson A group of Colorado voters contends that Section 3 of the Fourteenth Amendment to the Constitution prohibits former President Donald J. Trump, who seeks the Presidential nomination of the Republican Party in this year’s election, from becoming President again. The Colorado Supreme Court agreed with that contention. It ordered the …
…
continue reading
Trump v. Anderson JUSTICE SOTOMAYOR, JUSTICE KAGAN, and JUSTICE JACKSON, concurring in the judgment. "“If it is not necessary to decide more to dispose of a case, then it is necessary not to decide more.” Dobbs v. Jackson Women’s Health Organization, 597 U. S. 215, 348 (2022) (ROBERTS, C. J., concurring in judgment). That fundamental principle of j…
…
continue reading
Trump v. Anderson DONALD J. TRUMP, PETITIONER v. NORMA ANDERSON, ET AL. ON WRIT OF CERTIORARI TO THE SUPREME COURT OF COLORADO [March 4, 2024] JUSTICE BARRETT, concurring in part and concurring in the judgment. I join Parts I and II–B of the Court’s opinion. I agree that States lack the power to enforce Section 3 against Presidential candidates. Th…
…
continue reading
The U.S. Supreme Court ruled unanimously that individual states cannot remove former President Donald Trump from their ballots based on the 14th Amendment. In an unsigned opinion, the court said only Congress, not states, can disqualify presidential candidates under the Constitution's so-called "insurrection clause." William Brangham reports. PBS N…
…
continue reading
1
Derrick Michael Lawlor v. His Majesty the King (40500)
1:15:47
1:15:47
Riproduci in seguito
Riproduci in seguito
Liste
Like
Like aggiunto
1:15:47
The appellant engaged in a sexual encounter with two other men in a park. A number of hours later, the body of one of those men was found in the park; he had died due to external neck compression. The appellant had mental health difficulties and had consumed both psychiatric medication and alcohol around the time he was in the park with the victim …
…
continue reading
The Supreme Court says it will hear arguments over whether Donald Trump is immune from prosecution for his efforts to overturn the 2020 presidential election. The justices set oral arguments for the week of April 22. Trump's pending trial in a federal court in Washington will remain on hold until then. William Brangham reports. PBS NewsHour is supp…
…
continue reading
1
Garland v. Cargill
1:30:25
1:30:25
Riproduci in seguito
Riproduci in seguito
Liste
Like
Like aggiunto
1:30:25
A case in which the Court will decide whether a bump stock device is a “machinegun” as defined in 26 U.S.C. § 5845(b).
…
continue reading
Coinbase, Inc. v. SuskiDi Supreme Court of the United States
…
continue reading
1
Garland, Att'y Gen. v. Cargill
1:17:39
1:17:39
Riproduci in seguito
Riproduci in seguito
Liste
Like
Like aggiunto
1:17:39
Garland, Att'y Gen. v. CargillDi Supreme Court of the United States
…
continue reading
1
Cantero v. Bank of America, N.A.
1:47:46
1:47:46
Riproduci in seguito
Riproduci in seguito
Liste
Like
Like aggiunto
1:47:46
A case in which the Court will decide whether the National Bank Act preempts the application of state escrow-interest laws to national banks.
…
continue reading
A case in which the Court will decide whether a district court can enter a criminal forfeiture order when the time limit specified in the Federal Rules of Criminal Procedure has already passed.
…
continue reading
1
Cantero v. Bank of America, N.A.
1:32:33
1:32:33
Riproduci in seguito
Riproduci in seguito
Liste
Like
Like aggiunto
1:32:33
Cantero v. Bank of America, N.A.Di Supreme Court of the United States
…
continue reading
McIntosh v. United StatesDi Supreme Court of the United States
…
continue reading
The Supreme Court heard arguments in highly consequential cases navigating First Amendment protections on social media. Tech companies are taking on state laws, decrying conservative censorship online. A decision could fundamentally change the use of speech on the internet. Amna Nawaz discussed the hearing with Supreme Court analyst Marcia Coyle. P…
…
continue reading
1
Moody v. NetChoice, LLC
2:22:31
2:22:31
Riproduci in seguito
Riproduci in seguito
Liste
Like
Like aggiunto
2:22:31
A case in which the Court will decide whether Florida S.B. 7072’s content-moderation restrictions comply with the First Amendment; and whether the law’s individualized-explanation requirements comply with the First Amendment.
…
continue reading
1
NetChoice, LLC v. Paxton
1:20:05
1:20:05
Riproduci in seguito
Riproduci in seguito
Liste
Like
Like aggiunto
1:20:05
A case in which the Court will decide whether a state law restricting social media platforms from engaging in editorial choices about whether, and how, to publish and disseminate speech and requiring them to submit to onerous operational and disclosure requirements violates the First Amendment.
…
continue reading
1
NetChoice, LLC v. Paxton
1:08:47
1:08:47
Riproduci in seguito
Riproduci in seguito
Liste
Like
Like aggiunto
1:08:47
NetChoice, LLC v. PaxtonDi Supreme Court of the United States
…
continue reading
1
Moody v. NetChoice, LLC
2:02:23
2:02:23
Riproduci in seguito
Riproduci in seguito
Liste
Like
Like aggiunto
2:02:23
Moody v. NetChoice, LLCDi Supreme Court of the United States
…
continue reading
MCELRATH v. GEORGIA Damian McElrath was charged with malice murder, felony murder, and aggravated assault -- all related to the death of his mother. A jury returned a split verdict. For the malice-murder charge, finding him “not guilty by reason of insanity” and “guilty but mentally ill” to the other counts. The Georgia Supreme Court stated that be…
…
continue reading
Great Lakes v. Raiders Great Lakes Insurance (organized in Germany and HQ in UK) entered into a maritime insurance contract with Raiders Retreat Realty Company (HQ in PA). The contract included a provision to apply New York law. A Raiders vessel had an incident in Florida, Raiders then filed a claim. Great Lakes filed for declaratory judgment in a …
…
continue reading
A case in which the Court will decide whether a copyright plaintiff can recover damages for acts that allegedly occurred more than three years before the filing of a lawsuit.
…
continue reading
1
Ohio v. Environmental Protection Agency
1:29:05
1:29:05
Riproduci in seguito
Riproduci in seguito
Liste
Like
Like aggiunto
1:29:05
A case in which the Court will decide (1) whether to stay the Environmental Protection Agency’s federal emission reductions rule, the Good Neighbor Plan; and (2) whether the emissions controls imposed by the rule are reasonable regardless of the number of states subject to the rule.
…
continue reading
1
Ohio v. EPA
1:16:30
1:16:30
Riproduci in seguito
Riproduci in seguito
Liste
Like
Like aggiunto
1:16:30
Ohio v. EPADi Supreme Court of the United States
…
continue reading
Warner Chappell Music, Inc. v. NealyDi Supreme Court of the United States
…
continue reading
1
Nicolas Landry v. His Majesty the King (40394)
1:12:47
1:12:47
Riproduci in seguito
Riproduci in seguito
Liste
Like
Like aggiunto
1:12:47
(PUBLICATION BAN IN CASE) The appellant, a police officer, was temporarily off work because of medical problems. During a meeting with a physician-arbitrator who was to determine whether his disability was permanent, the appellant misrepresented his work activities with his former spouse’s travel agencies. The physician-arbitrator found that his di…
…
continue reading
1
Bissonnette v. LePage Bakeries Park St., LLC
1:00:18
1:00:18
Riproduci in seguito
Riproduci in seguito
Liste
Like
Like aggiunto
1:00:18
A case in which the Court will decide whether, to be exempt from the Federal Arbitration Act, a class of workers that is actively engaged in interstate transportation must also be employed by a company in the transportation industry.
…
continue reading
1
Corner Post, Inc. v. Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System
1:10:13
1:10:13
Riproduci in seguito
Riproduci in seguito
Liste
Like
Like aggiunto
1:10:13
A case in which the Court will decide whether a plaintiff’s Administrative Procedure Act claim “first accrues” under 28 U.S.C. § 2401(a) when an agency issues a rule or when the rule first causes harm to the plaintiff.
…
continue reading
1
Corner Post, Inc. v. Bd. of Governors, FRS
1:00:18
1:00:18
Riproduci in seguito
Riproduci in seguito
Liste
Like
Like aggiunto
1:00:18
Corner Post, Inc. v. Bd. of Governors, FRSDi Supreme Court of the United States
…
continue reading
Bissonnette v. LePage Bakeries Park St., LLCDi Supreme Court of the United States
…
continue reading
1
Daniel Hodgson v. His Majesty the King (40498)
2:01:08
2:01:08
Riproduci in seguito
Riproduci in seguito
Liste
Like
Like aggiunto
2:01:08
Appellant Daniel Hodgson was charged with second-degree murder following a death at a house party. The victim, a large man, had become aggressive towards the house owner and refused to leave. Mr. Hodgson, who had been sleeping in a nearby bedroom, was asked by a guest to help remove the victim from the house. The victim died after Mr. Hodgson appli…
…
continue reading
1
His Majesty the King v. Private D.T. Vu (40655)
1:00:12
1:00:12
Riproduci in seguito
Riproduci in seguito
Liste
Like
Like aggiunto
1:00:12
(Publication ban in case) In the Court Martial, a military judge acquitted the respondent, Private D.T. Vu, of sexual assault under s. 130 of the National Defence Act, R.S.C. 1985, c. N-5 (“NDA”), that is to say, s. 271 of the Criminal Code, R.S.C. 1985, c. C-46. It is alleged that the respondent performed a sex act on the complainant who was incap…
…
continue reading
1
Yves Caleb Jr. Charles v. His Majesty the King (40319)
1:05:13
1:05:13
Riproduci in seguito
Riproduci in seguito
Liste
Like
Like aggiunto
1:05:13
After a trial in the Court of Québec, the appellant, Yves Caleb Jr. Charles, was convicted of assault with a weapon, using an imitation firearm in the commission of assault, and uttering threats. During the trial, a prosecution witness refused to cooperate, and the trial judge allowed the prosecution to introduce an out of court statement made by t…
…
continue reading
The Supreme Court heard arguments in a landmark election case looking at whether Donald Trump's actions on Jan. 6 should disqualify him from appearing on Colorado's ballot. The justices scrutinized an obscure provision in the 14th Amendment at the center of this case. Amna Nawaz discussed the hearing with William Brangham and Supreme Court analyst …
…
continue reading
DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE RURAL DEVELOPMENT RURAL HOUSING SERVICE v. KIRTZ Reginald Kirtz obtained a loan from the Department of Agriculture Rural Development Rural Housing Service. According to Kirtz, the USDA later told one of the major credit agencies (TransUnion) that Kirtz was behind on his payments. Kirtz says this was false and these false s…
…
continue reading
TREVOR MURRAY, PETITIONER v. UBS SECURITIES, LLC, ET AL. As part of Trevor Murray's job at UBS, he had to file reports to the Securities Exchange Commission (SEC). In these reports, he had to certify that the reports reflected his personal and independent views. Despite physical separation from the rest of the unit, Murray claimed that he was recei…
…
continue reading
1
Trump v. Anderson
2:09:05
2:09:05
Riproduci in seguito
Riproduci in seguito
Liste
Like
Like aggiunto
2:09:05
A case in which the Court will decide whether Section Three of the Fourteenth Amendment disqualifies Donald Trump from being listed on the 2024 presidential primary ballot.
…
continue reading