))
The Six Most Controversial Takes from Excess Returns in 2024
Manage episode 450816148 series 3614383
Contenuto fornito da Jack Forehand, Justin Carbonneau and Matt Zeigler, Jack Forehand, Justin Carbonneau, and Matt Zeigler. Tutti i contenuti dei podcast, inclusi episodi, grafica e descrizioni dei podcast, vengono caricati e forniti direttamente da Jack Forehand, Justin Carbonneau and Matt Zeigler, Jack Forehand, Justin Carbonneau, and Matt Zeigler o dal partner della piattaforma podcast. Se ritieni che qualcuno stia utilizzando la tua opera protetta da copyright senza la tua autorizzazione, puoi seguire la procedura descritta qui https://it.player.fm/legal.
In this episode of Two Quants and a Financial Planner, Jack and Matt dive into some of the most controversial takes we've heard on Excess Returns in 2024. From Aswath Damodaran's spicy thoughts on the Berkshire annual meeting (spoiler: he's not a fan) to Cem Karsan's mind-bending perspective on options being the "dog" rather than the "tail," we're breaking down six of the hottest takes from 2024. We explore everything from Meb Faber challenging the sacred cow of dividend investing to groundbreaking research suggesting that maybe we don't need intuitive explanations for what works in the market. Plus, we bring in a special guest to help us mere mortals understand the complex world of options. As two self-proclaimed "non-controversial" guys, we try to find the nuance in these polarizing perspectives. Whether you're a quant, a value investor, or just someone interested in different ways of thinking about markets, there's something here for everyone. And yes, we even manage to work in references to everything from Little Rascals to My Fair Lady (Matt's brain works in mysterious ways). Join us for an episode that proves even "wildly controversial" Jack Forehand can stir things up once in a while! 😉
SEE LATEST EPISODES
FIND OUT MORE ABOUT VALIDEA CAPITAL
FIND OUT MORE ABOUT SUNPOINTE INVESTMENTS
FOLLOW JACK
FOLLOW JUSTIN
FOLLOW MATT
94 episodi
Condividi
