))
A pre-conviction criminal restitution lien doesn't violate the automatic stay
Manage episode 313806152 series 3288514
Contenuto fornito da Michael Rice. Tutti i contenuti dei podcast, inclusi episodi, grafica e descrizioni dei podcast, vengono caricati e forniti direttamente da Michael Rice o dal partner della piattaforma podcast. Se ritieni che qualcuno stia utilizzando la tua opera protetta da copyright senza la tua autorizzazione, puoi seguire la procedura descritta qui https://it.player.fm/legal.
In today’s (first!) episode, I walk you through a recent case in which an Arizona bankruptcy court ruled that a creditor doesn’t violate the automatic stay when a creditor pursues a pre-petition criminal restitution lien. In re Nash, 19-bk-11174 (Judge Ballinger, October 21, 2021).
In the episode I mentioned the Gruntz case in the Ninth Circuit which can be found at 202 F.3d 1074 (9th Cir. 2000).
You can find the Nash opinion on my blog at https://michaelricelaw.com.
Please reach out to me! I’m actively looking for new bankruptcy clients, especially challenging cases, adversaries, or contested matters. While I’m only licensed in California and can only give legal advice to California clients, I’d love to hear your story or know if I can help some other way.
Attorney advertising. My practice qualifies as a debt relief agency because I help people file for bankruptcy under federal law--among other things!
565 Pier Avenue, #1481, Hermosa Beach, California 90254
7 episodi
Condividi
