))
Cascading OKRs: rigid vs. directional
Manage episode 300256032 series 2835921
Contenuto fornito da Perdoo. Tutti i contenuti dei podcast, inclusi episodi, grafica e descrizioni dei podcast, vengono caricati e forniti direttamente da Perdoo o dal partner della piattaforma podcast. Se ritieni che qualcuno stia utilizzando la tua opera protetta da copyright senza la tua autorizzazione, puoi seguire la procedura descritta qui https://it.player.fm/legal.
If you've read "Measure What Matters" you've probably come across the term cascading OKRs. Typically, when you think of cascading OKRs, top-down rigid cascading is what comes to mind.
In an ideal world, rigid cascading seems logical — it gives an impression that an entire organization is pulling in the same direction. In reality organizations are slightly more complex and require multi-directional goal setting.
Top-down cascading is a reflection of traditional command and control. Therefore, there's a good reason why many softwares and consultants discourage top-down cascading of goals.
So what is cascading OKRs all about? We spoke to Peter Kappus, an OKR consultant, about:
- The definition of cascading OKRs
- Why organizations should avoid rigid top-down cascading?
- What should organizations be focusing on instead?
- Rigid vs. directional cascading
-
Curious to learn more? Here are some additional resources:
-
Ready to track your OKRs the right way? Head over to Perdoo and create a FREE account.
Learn more about strategy, goals (OKRs & KPIs) & growth — visit the Perdoo Resources Hub.
21 episodi
Condividi
