Artwork

Contenuto fornito da Bitesize Bio. Tutti i contenuti dei podcast, inclusi episodi, grafica e descrizioni dei podcast, vengono caricati e forniti direttamente da Bitesize Bio o dal partner della piattaforma podcast. Se ritieni che qualcuno stia utilizzando la tua opera protetta da copyright senza la tua autorizzazione, puoi seguire la procedura descritta qui https://it.player.fm/legal.
Player FM - App Podcast
Vai offline con l'app Player FM !

Ten Common Statistical Mistakes to Watch out for When Writing or Reviewing a Manuscript

51:32
 
Condividi
 

Manage episode 381405330 series 3391756
Contenuto fornito da Bitesize Bio. Tutti i contenuti dei podcast, inclusi episodi, grafica e descrizioni dei podcast, vengono caricati e forniti direttamente da Bitesize Bio o dal partner della piattaforma podcast. Se ritieni che qualcuno stia utilizzando la tua opera protetta da copyright senza la tua autorizzazione, puoi seguire la procedura descritta qui https://it.player.fm/legal.

Some scientific papers are unbelievable as they showcase experimental excellence that we did not think possible. These papers astound us with their groundbreaking findings and meticulous methodologies.

However, alongside these unbelievably good papers, there are papers that are unbelievable due to the pervasive presence of statistical mistakes that undermine their credibility. Whether due to negligence, lack of expertise, or a rush to publish, these errors cast doubt on the validity of the reported results and conclusions.

In this episode of Listen In, JJ Orban de Xivry delves into the ten most common statistical mistakes that plague scientific research (Makin and Orban de Xivry, eLife, 2019).

With a focus on identifying these errors, he sheds light on the detrimental impact they have on the reliability of scientific findings. By identifying and rectifying statistical mistakes, researchers can ensure the foundation of their field of study.

Watch the full presentation here: https://events.bitesizebio.com/ten-common-statistical-mistakes-to

Browse all episodes of the Listen In Series here: https://listen-in.bitesizebio.com/

  continue reading

112 episodi

Artwork
iconCondividi
 
Manage episode 381405330 series 3391756
Contenuto fornito da Bitesize Bio. Tutti i contenuti dei podcast, inclusi episodi, grafica e descrizioni dei podcast, vengono caricati e forniti direttamente da Bitesize Bio o dal partner della piattaforma podcast. Se ritieni che qualcuno stia utilizzando la tua opera protetta da copyright senza la tua autorizzazione, puoi seguire la procedura descritta qui https://it.player.fm/legal.

Some scientific papers are unbelievable as they showcase experimental excellence that we did not think possible. These papers astound us with their groundbreaking findings and meticulous methodologies.

However, alongside these unbelievably good papers, there are papers that are unbelievable due to the pervasive presence of statistical mistakes that undermine their credibility. Whether due to negligence, lack of expertise, or a rush to publish, these errors cast doubt on the validity of the reported results and conclusions.

In this episode of Listen In, JJ Orban de Xivry delves into the ten most common statistical mistakes that plague scientific research (Makin and Orban de Xivry, eLife, 2019).

With a focus on identifying these errors, he sheds light on the detrimental impact they have on the reliability of scientific findings. By identifying and rectifying statistical mistakes, researchers can ensure the foundation of their field of study.

Watch the full presentation here: https://events.bitesizebio.com/ten-common-statistical-mistakes-to

Browse all episodes of the Listen In Series here: https://listen-in.bitesizebio.com/

  continue reading

112 episodi

Tutti gli episodi

×
 
Loading …

Benvenuto su Player FM!

Player FM ricerca sul web podcast di alta qualità che tu possa goderti adesso. È la migliore app di podcast e funziona su Android, iPhone e web. Registrati per sincronizzare le iscrizioni su tutti i tuoi dispositivi.

 

Guida rapida