))
7/21/21 - Washington Supreme Court Says Termination of a Contract, Not for Default, Equals a Termination for Convenience
Manage episode 316730614 series 3278602
Contenuto fornito da Smith Freed Eberhard. Tutti i contenuti dei podcast, inclusi episodi, grafica e descrizioni dei podcast, vengono caricati e forniti direttamente da Smith Freed Eberhard o dal partner della piattaforma podcast. Se ritieni che qualcuno stia utilizzando la tua opera protetta da copyright senza la tua autorizzazione, puoi seguire la procedura descritta qui https://it.player.fm/legal.
In this week's episode, Justin Wickizer, Director of Legal Operations, discusses Smith Freed Eberhard's latest Legal Alert, "Washington Supreme Court Says Termination of a Contract, Not for Default, Equals a Termination for Convenience."
Here, the Washington Supreme Court illustrates how the standard specifications incorporated into the subject contract –between a contractor and the City of Puyallup –automatically converts an improper termination for default into a termination for convenience and the financial impact of the same.
25 episodi
Condividi
