Hosted by Ryan Warner and Chandra Thomas Whitfield, CPR News' daily interview show focuses on the state's people, issues and ideas.
…
continue reading
Contenuto fornito da Bobby Capucci. Tutti i contenuti dei podcast, inclusi episodi, grafica e descrizioni dei podcast, vengono caricati e forniti direttamente da Bobby Capucci o dal partner della piattaforma podcast. Se ritieni che qualcuno stia utilizzando la tua opera protetta da copyright senza la tua autorizzazione, puoi seguire la procedura descritta qui https://it.player.fm/legal.
Player FM - App Podcast
Vai offline con l'app Player FM !
Vai offline con l'app Player FM !
Judge Subramanian And The Second Denied Request For A Gag Order (11/10/24)
Manage episode 449428169 series 3380507
Contenuto fornito da Bobby Capucci. Tutti i contenuti dei podcast, inclusi episodi, grafica e descrizioni dei podcast, vengono caricati e forniti direttamente da Bobby Capucci o dal partner della piattaforma podcast. Se ritieni che qualcuno stia utilizzando la tua opera protetta da copyright senza la tua autorizzazione, puoi seguire la procedura descritta qui https://it.player.fm/legal.
In the case of United States v. Combs (24-CR-542), Judge Arun Subramanian addressed Sean Combs' motion filed on October 20, 2024, seeking to prohibit prospective witnesses and their attorneys from making extrajudicial statements that could potentially interfere with his right to a fair trial. Combs specified that this category included "all those who claim to be victims." The government opposed this request, arguing that such a gag order was "extraordinary and beyond the purview" of Local Rule 23.1.
After considering the arguments, Judge Subramanian denied Combs' motion. The court concluded that imposing a gag order on alleged victims and their attorneys was not justified under the circumstances and fell outside the scope of Local Rule 23.1. This decision allows prospective witnesses and their legal representatives to continue making public statements, provided they do not violate existing legal standards or court orders.
(commercial at 8:33)
to contact me:
bobbycapucci@protonmail.com
source:
gov.uscourts.nysd.628425.63.0.pdf
Become a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-epstein-chronicles--5003294/support.
…
continue reading
After considering the arguments, Judge Subramanian denied Combs' motion. The court concluded that imposing a gag order on alleged victims and their attorneys was not justified under the circumstances and fell outside the scope of Local Rule 23.1. This decision allows prospective witnesses and their legal representatives to continue making public statements, provided they do not violate existing legal standards or court orders.
(commercial at 8:33)
to contact me:
bobbycapucci@protonmail.com
source:
gov.uscourts.nysd.628425.63.0.pdf
Become a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-epstein-chronicles--5003294/support.
1036 episodi
Manage episode 449428169 series 3380507
Contenuto fornito da Bobby Capucci. Tutti i contenuti dei podcast, inclusi episodi, grafica e descrizioni dei podcast, vengono caricati e forniti direttamente da Bobby Capucci o dal partner della piattaforma podcast. Se ritieni che qualcuno stia utilizzando la tua opera protetta da copyright senza la tua autorizzazione, puoi seguire la procedura descritta qui https://it.player.fm/legal.
In the case of United States v. Combs (24-CR-542), Judge Arun Subramanian addressed Sean Combs' motion filed on October 20, 2024, seeking to prohibit prospective witnesses and their attorneys from making extrajudicial statements that could potentially interfere with his right to a fair trial. Combs specified that this category included "all those who claim to be victims." The government opposed this request, arguing that such a gag order was "extraordinary and beyond the purview" of Local Rule 23.1.
After considering the arguments, Judge Subramanian denied Combs' motion. The court concluded that imposing a gag order on alleged victims and their attorneys was not justified under the circumstances and fell outside the scope of Local Rule 23.1. This decision allows prospective witnesses and their legal representatives to continue making public statements, provided they do not violate existing legal standards or court orders.
(commercial at 8:33)
to contact me:
bobbycapucci@protonmail.com
source:
gov.uscourts.nysd.628425.63.0.pdf
Become a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-epstein-chronicles--5003294/support.
…
continue reading
After considering the arguments, Judge Subramanian denied Combs' motion. The court concluded that imposing a gag order on alleged victims and their attorneys was not justified under the circumstances and fell outside the scope of Local Rule 23.1. This decision allows prospective witnesses and their legal representatives to continue making public statements, provided they do not violate existing legal standards or court orders.
(commercial at 8:33)
to contact me:
bobbycapucci@protonmail.com
source:
gov.uscourts.nysd.628425.63.0.pdf
Become a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-epstein-chronicles--5003294/support.
1036 episodi
كل الحلقات
×Benvenuto su Player FM!
Player FM ricerca sul web podcast di alta qualità che tu possa goderti adesso. È la migliore app di podcast e funziona su Android, iPhone e web. Registrati per sincronizzare le iscrizioni su tutti i tuoi dispositivi.