Artwork

Contenuto fornito da The Trial Of Karen Read | Justice For John O'Keefe and True Crime Today. Tutti i contenuti dei podcast, inclusi episodi, grafica e descrizioni dei podcast, vengono caricati e forniti direttamente da The Trial Of Karen Read | Justice For John O'Keefe and True Crime Today o dal partner della piattaforma podcast. Se ritieni che qualcuno stia utilizzando la tua opera protetta da copyright senza la tua autorizzazione, puoi seguire la procedura descritta qui https://it.player.fm/legal.
Player FM - App Podcast
Vai offline con l'app Player FM !

Will There Be A Karen Read Trial Part Two?

6:47
 
Condividi
 

Manage episode 428169329 series 3569233
Contenuto fornito da The Trial Of Karen Read | Justice For John O'Keefe and True Crime Today. Tutti i contenuti dei podcast, inclusi episodi, grafica e descrizioni dei podcast, vengono caricati e forniti direttamente da The Trial Of Karen Read | Justice For John O'Keefe and True Crime Today o dal partner della piattaforma podcast. Se ritieni che qualcuno stia utilizzando la tua opera protetta da copyright senza la tua autorizzazione, puoi seguire la procedura descritta qui https://it.player.fm/legal.
In this episode of "Hidden Killers With Tony Brueski," former Felony Prosecutor and attorney Eric Faddis discusses the hung jury in Karen Read's case and its implications. The prolonged deliberation, which lasted over six days, suggested either a defense verdict or a mistrial. Faddis explains that a mistrial is a significant challenge for prosecutors, as it forces them to decide whether to retry the case, negotiate a plea, or drop the charges altogether. He highlights the jury's inability to agree on even lesser charges, suggesting reasonable doubt influenced the decision. Faddis notes the prosecution's potential overconfidence and the possibility that they didn't address key issues effectively. He speculates that the prosecution might consider juror feedback on their split to decide whether to pursue another trial. Faddis also discusses the strategic considerations behind deciding whether to retry a case, emphasizing the need for strong evidence and effective witness preparation. The upcoming status conference on July 22nd will likely determine the next steps, including the possibility of a plea deal for Karen Read to avoid another lengthy trial. The conversation underscores the complexities and uncertainties inherent in the legal process, especially in cases with a hung jury and reasonable doubt.
### Main Points
- The Karen Read case resulted in a hung jury after over six days of deliberation.
- Faddis explains the difficulties and dissatisfaction for prosecutors dealing with mistrials.
- The Commonwealth must decide whether to retry the case, negotiate a plea, or dismiss the charges.
- The jury's inability to agree on lesser charges indicates significant reasonable doubt.
- Prosecution's potential overconfidence and failure to address key issues may have contributed to the mistrial.
- Juror feedback on their deliberation split could influence the decision to retry the case.
- Effective witness preparation and addressing key issues are crucial for a successful prosecution.
- The upcoming status conference on July 22nd will determine the next steps, including the possibility of a plea deal for Karen Read.
### Hashtags
#HiddenKillersWithTonyBrueski #EricFaddis #KarenRead #HungJury #ProsecutionChallenges #LegalProcess #ReasonableDoubt
Want to listen to ALL of our podcasts AD-FREE? Subscribe through APPLE PODCASTS, and try it for three days free: https://tinyurl.com/ycw626tj
Follow Our Other Cases: https://www.truecrimetodaypod.com
The latest on The Downfall of Diddy, The Trial of Karen Read, The Murder Of Maddie Soto, Catching the Long Island Serial Killer, Awaiting Admission: BTK’s Unconfessed Crimes, Delphi Murders: Inside the Crime, Chad & Lori Daybell, The Murder of Ana Walshe, Alex Murdaugh, Bryan Kohberger, Lucy Letby, Kouri Richins, Malevolent Mormon Mommys, Justice for Harmony Montgomery, The Murder of Stephen Smith, The Murder of Madeline Kingsbury, and much more! Listen at https://www.truecrimetodaypod.com
  continue reading

415 episodi

Artwork
iconCondividi
 
Manage episode 428169329 series 3569233
Contenuto fornito da The Trial Of Karen Read | Justice For John O'Keefe and True Crime Today. Tutti i contenuti dei podcast, inclusi episodi, grafica e descrizioni dei podcast, vengono caricati e forniti direttamente da The Trial Of Karen Read | Justice For John O'Keefe and True Crime Today o dal partner della piattaforma podcast. Se ritieni che qualcuno stia utilizzando la tua opera protetta da copyright senza la tua autorizzazione, puoi seguire la procedura descritta qui https://it.player.fm/legal.
In this episode of "Hidden Killers With Tony Brueski," former Felony Prosecutor and attorney Eric Faddis discusses the hung jury in Karen Read's case and its implications. The prolonged deliberation, which lasted over six days, suggested either a defense verdict or a mistrial. Faddis explains that a mistrial is a significant challenge for prosecutors, as it forces them to decide whether to retry the case, negotiate a plea, or drop the charges altogether. He highlights the jury's inability to agree on even lesser charges, suggesting reasonable doubt influenced the decision. Faddis notes the prosecution's potential overconfidence and the possibility that they didn't address key issues effectively. He speculates that the prosecution might consider juror feedback on their split to decide whether to pursue another trial. Faddis also discusses the strategic considerations behind deciding whether to retry a case, emphasizing the need for strong evidence and effective witness preparation. The upcoming status conference on July 22nd will likely determine the next steps, including the possibility of a plea deal for Karen Read to avoid another lengthy trial. The conversation underscores the complexities and uncertainties inherent in the legal process, especially in cases with a hung jury and reasonable doubt.
### Main Points
- The Karen Read case resulted in a hung jury after over six days of deliberation.
- Faddis explains the difficulties and dissatisfaction for prosecutors dealing with mistrials.
- The Commonwealth must decide whether to retry the case, negotiate a plea, or dismiss the charges.
- The jury's inability to agree on lesser charges indicates significant reasonable doubt.
- Prosecution's potential overconfidence and failure to address key issues may have contributed to the mistrial.
- Juror feedback on their deliberation split could influence the decision to retry the case.
- Effective witness preparation and addressing key issues are crucial for a successful prosecution.
- The upcoming status conference on July 22nd will determine the next steps, including the possibility of a plea deal for Karen Read.
### Hashtags
#HiddenKillersWithTonyBrueski #EricFaddis #KarenRead #HungJury #ProsecutionChallenges #LegalProcess #ReasonableDoubt
Want to listen to ALL of our podcasts AD-FREE? Subscribe through APPLE PODCASTS, and try it for three days free: https://tinyurl.com/ycw626tj
Follow Our Other Cases: https://www.truecrimetodaypod.com
The latest on The Downfall of Diddy, The Trial of Karen Read, The Murder Of Maddie Soto, Catching the Long Island Serial Killer, Awaiting Admission: BTK’s Unconfessed Crimes, Delphi Murders: Inside the Crime, Chad & Lori Daybell, The Murder of Ana Walshe, Alex Murdaugh, Bryan Kohberger, Lucy Letby, Kouri Richins, Malevolent Mormon Mommys, Justice for Harmony Montgomery, The Murder of Stephen Smith, The Murder of Madeline Kingsbury, and much more! Listen at https://www.truecrimetodaypod.com
  continue reading

415 episodi

Tất cả các tập

×
 
Loading …

Benvenuto su Player FM!

Player FM ricerca sul web podcast di alta qualità che tu possa goderti adesso. È la migliore app di podcast e funziona su Android, iPhone e web. Registrati per sincronizzare le iscrizioni su tutti i tuoi dispositivi.

 

Guida rapida