Artwork

Contenuto fornito da Linguistics After Dark. Tutti i contenuti dei podcast, inclusi episodi, grafica e descrizioni dei podcast, vengono caricati e forniti direttamente da Linguistics After Dark o dal partner della piattaforma podcast. Se ritieni che qualcuno stia utilizzando la tua opera protetta da copyright senza la tua autorizzazione, puoi seguire la procedura descritta qui https://it.player.fm/legal.
Player FM - App Podcast
Vai offline con l'app Player FM !

Episode 12: Dead Language Power

1:06:41
 
Condividi
 

Manage episode 437759720 series 2589004
Contenuto fornito da Linguistics After Dark. Tutti i contenuti dei podcast, inclusi episodi, grafica e descrizioni dei podcast, vengono caricati e forniti direttamente da Linguistics After Dark o dal partner della piattaforma podcast. Se ritieni che qualcuno stia utilizzando la tua opera protetta da copyright senza la tua autorizzazione, puoi seguire la procedura descritta qui https://it.player.fm/legal.

Wherein we are not warful.

Jump right to:

  • 3:36 A slight correction about the etymology of “magic”
  • 5:55 Linguistics Thing Of The Day: Verb voice, aka diathesis
  • 23:01 Question 1: I [once] initially used "tiring" to describe someone, and then realized it didn't quite fit right, so I used "tiresome" instead. [T]hose should basically mean the same thing, and I can't [put the difference into words, but] they feel very different. How do words develop different connotations like that? / does the “-eous” suffix mean that something just has a flavor or hue of a thing but isn’t actually the thing? (Flavor/hue may not be the right words but I don’t remember what the correct term is) Like how “rightful” and “righteous” are not the same. I haven’t looked up the definition of “beauteous”, but I think it does mean something different from “beautiful”.
  • 35:39 Question 2: I saw this screenshot of a tumblr post and it got me wondering. The grammar in the dialogue might be trying to suggest that the cavemen's language is "primitive", and we could imagine that the scene is set in a time when (spoken) language was still very much in development compared to what it is today. With that in mind, do you think they would have opted to use consonant clusters like gl, gr, and rg in their names? Are those (especially gl) common across languages spoken today (idk what to look for in WALS...)? When do you think they first appeared in a spoken language? What do we know about the sounds (phonemes?) our ancestors could produce; which likely came first and which ones are more recent?
  • 51:30 Question 3: "Optimality Theory is bullshit." Discuss.
  • 1:01:28 The puzzler: What is 3/7 chicken, 2/3 cat, and 2/4 goat?

Covered in this episode:

  • If you are a patient, you are experiencing a problem; if you are being patient, you are probably also experiencing a problem
  • “Collectivity” is not a word people know
  • Etymology is not destiny
  • English “caveman speak” relies heavily on phonesthemes
  • Human babies are scientifically proven to evolve into human adults
  • Sooner or later, M shows up
  • Eli is not an optimality theorist (because he thinks optimality theory is bullshit)
  • Eli apologizes to optimality theorists for calling their thing bullshit
  • Sarah fails to correctly divide a word into two-letter units

Links and other post-show thoughts:

Ask us questions:

Send your questions (text or voice memo) to [email protected], or find us as @lxadpodcast on Twitter, Instagram, and Facebook.

Credits:

Linguistics After Dark is produced by Emfozzing Enterprises. Audio editing is done by Luca, and show notes and transcriptions are a team effort. Our music is "Covert Affair" by Kevin MacLeod.

And until next time… if you weren’t consciously aware of your tongue in your mouth, now you are :)

  continue reading

21 episodi

Artwork

Episode 12: Dead Language Power

Linguistics After Dark

345 subscribers

published

iconCondividi
 
Manage episode 437759720 series 2589004
Contenuto fornito da Linguistics After Dark. Tutti i contenuti dei podcast, inclusi episodi, grafica e descrizioni dei podcast, vengono caricati e forniti direttamente da Linguistics After Dark o dal partner della piattaforma podcast. Se ritieni che qualcuno stia utilizzando la tua opera protetta da copyright senza la tua autorizzazione, puoi seguire la procedura descritta qui https://it.player.fm/legal.

Wherein we are not warful.

Jump right to:

  • 3:36 A slight correction about the etymology of “magic”
  • 5:55 Linguistics Thing Of The Day: Verb voice, aka diathesis
  • 23:01 Question 1: I [once] initially used "tiring" to describe someone, and then realized it didn't quite fit right, so I used "tiresome" instead. [T]hose should basically mean the same thing, and I can't [put the difference into words, but] they feel very different. How do words develop different connotations like that? / does the “-eous” suffix mean that something just has a flavor or hue of a thing but isn’t actually the thing? (Flavor/hue may not be the right words but I don’t remember what the correct term is) Like how “rightful” and “righteous” are not the same. I haven’t looked up the definition of “beauteous”, but I think it does mean something different from “beautiful”.
  • 35:39 Question 2: I saw this screenshot of a tumblr post and it got me wondering. The grammar in the dialogue might be trying to suggest that the cavemen's language is "primitive", and we could imagine that the scene is set in a time when (spoken) language was still very much in development compared to what it is today. With that in mind, do you think they would have opted to use consonant clusters like gl, gr, and rg in their names? Are those (especially gl) common across languages spoken today (idk what to look for in WALS...)? When do you think they first appeared in a spoken language? What do we know about the sounds (phonemes?) our ancestors could produce; which likely came first and which ones are more recent?
  • 51:30 Question 3: "Optimality Theory is bullshit." Discuss.
  • 1:01:28 The puzzler: What is 3/7 chicken, 2/3 cat, and 2/4 goat?

Covered in this episode:

  • If you are a patient, you are experiencing a problem; if you are being patient, you are probably also experiencing a problem
  • “Collectivity” is not a word people know
  • Etymology is not destiny
  • English “caveman speak” relies heavily on phonesthemes
  • Human babies are scientifically proven to evolve into human adults
  • Sooner or later, M shows up
  • Eli is not an optimality theorist (because he thinks optimality theory is bullshit)
  • Eli apologizes to optimality theorists for calling their thing bullshit
  • Sarah fails to correctly divide a word into two-letter units

Links and other post-show thoughts:

Ask us questions:

Send your questions (text or voice memo) to [email protected], or find us as @lxadpodcast on Twitter, Instagram, and Facebook.

Credits:

Linguistics After Dark is produced by Emfozzing Enterprises. Audio editing is done by Luca, and show notes and transcriptions are a team effort. Our music is "Covert Affair" by Kevin MacLeod.

And until next time… if you weren’t consciously aware of your tongue in your mouth, now you are :)

  continue reading

21 episodi

Semua episod

×
 
Loading …

Benvenuto su Player FM!

Player FM ricerca sul web podcast di alta qualità che tu possa goderti adesso. È la migliore app di podcast e funziona su Android, iPhone e web. Registrati per sincronizzare le iscrizioni su tutti i tuoi dispositivi.

 

Guida rapida

Ascolta questo spettacolo mentre esplori
Riproduci